Bad Bill of the Week: Limiting Free Speech

This week’s “winner” of the Civitas Institute’s Bad Bill of the Week targets free speech. A sample of the article:

This week’s Bad Bill of the Week is actually a House Joint Resolution. HJR 171, crafted by Rep. Verla Insko (D-Orange), urges the NC General Assembly to draft a resolution opposing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and calling on Congress to amend the Constitution to reverse the free speech rights protected by the United decision.

For those who may not recall, the United decision reversed previous laws that banned independent political expenditures by corporations (including non-profits and unions). The expansion of free speech rights was met by liberal groups as some sort of “threat against democracy” – and Rep. Insko wants the U.S. Constitution amended to enshrine a permanent ban on free speech exercised by groups of individuals classified as “corporations.”

Opposition to the United decision, however, has nothing to do with preserving democracy or the voice of average citizens. Like most liberal/progressive issues, it has to do with control. In this case, liberal politicians want to control political speech by determining who gets to speak.

Read the whole summary here.

Voting Fraud Facts

Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation reviews the Supreme Court decision on Indiana’s voter ID law, which they OK’d.

The court said there is voter fraud — enough to make a difference in a close election.

Take Al Franken’s election to the Senate. Eight months declared Franken the winner by 300 votes. A group looked at the voter registration record, compared it to corrections records. The number of illegal votes — from just this factor — was four times the margin of victory.

The next threat: people would be automatically registered to vote, taking names from databases. Well, say they are taking from property tax rolls. What if you own property in two counties — you’d be registered in two. This could make a flawed system much worse, he says.

Conservatives don’t pay attention to the rules governing elections; the left has plenty of organizations dedicated to changing the rules.

Absentee ballots are the problem in real voter fraud ID. Look at what Kansas does: for an absentee ballot fraud, you must provide copy of ID, or Kansas drivers license number.

Georgia’s law requiring proof of citizenship has prevented thousands of phony votes, the George secretary of state says.

He tears apart the notion that NC has hordes of voters without ID. For instance, the comparison didn’t compare voter lists against lists of college IDs, military IDs, college ideas. They also used only exact matches, so “Hans A. von Spakovsky” the voter doesn’t match “Hans von Spakovsky” with a drivers license. So that means “Hans A. von Spakovsky” doesn’t have an ID!

In Georgia, the plaintiffs couldn’t bring forward one person who didn’t have an ID.

In seven years, with six million registered voters, similar demographics, they’ve only had 29,000 apply. That’s a few thousand a year.

In George, Barack Obama won the presidential vote. The turnout went up — and more than in most states.

Ditto for Indiana.

But voting is a right! comes the complaint. Well, traveling on public vehicle is a right, and the courts say it is, you need a photo ID to get on a plane. Or get married. Or enter a government building. Including the courts!

Look at South Carolina. The Holder Justice Department objected; SC sued. In the end, the state won.

He notes the Secretary of State Project, to find people to run for S of S to run elections. Note that the project got one of its favorites elected .. .in Minnesota, to help Franken win.

He joined a county elections board in Virginia. The GOP renominated him. The judges, Democrats, refused to appoint him.

What you do? Make sure local election boards will stand up for what is right. Becoming a poll watcher is important.

His parents grew up under fascism and communism. They told of how easily freedom can be lost.

Keeping elections honest “won’t happen unless you get involved.”

 

 

 

 

At CLC: Artur Davis and Ron Johnson on Losing Democrats, Reclaiming the Nation

Today, after the sequester,  ”the world continued” though the government was $85 billion poorer, Artur Davis, said.

His remarks were important for reminding conservatives who we haven’t reached out to.

“Cutting back, when you are spending too much, is not a radical idea, except in Washington, D.C.,” he said.

He said President Obama commented that he couldn’t cut 10 percent without hurting people.

Until now, the debate was the Democrats saying they want to spend a lot more, and Republicans want to spend … more.

NC Democrats argued that the values of the people were should be turned upside down, Davis said. “People who thought they had a home in the Democratic Party decided that home no longer exists.”

He talked about a young father, a Democrat,  who had two kids in the public schools. There are good teachers, the man said, but there are some bad ones, and he was tired of being accused of hating schools because he wants the bad teachers fired. He told similar stories.

Why did conservatives lose? We lost the disaffected Democrats. Davis said conservatives stopped being a party that made its case to people who work with their hands, who are middle class. “They worry about is going on in their lives,” he said.

What about those  with kids going to college? Putting parent in nursing home? Got a layoff notice? Can conservatives reach them. They don’t doubt nation. “They worry about their own security.”

“Many of these people were going to be ours,” he said. “But they slipped away.”  They were not convinced conservatives speak for them or to them.

They are worried about their powerlessness, about their needs. Conservatism must speak to all people — those in gated communities and those down in the hollows. When conservatives do that, “We will take this country back.”

A coach may tell a great athlete, “Remember who you are.” That’s what Americans need: “Remember who you are.”

RON JOHNSON

Francis De Luca: Johnson is the only manufacturer in Congress, so the only one who has made things. And one of only two accountants, so he can count.

In 2009 he was asked to speak at a tea party event. Obama had assailed doctors’ supposed greed. Johnson recalls how doctors saved his daughter born with a congenital heart defect.

“We had the freedom to call …. [on] the best surgeons in the world,” he said, and in a system that came up with medical miracles.

As a manufacturer, “when you have a problem, you try to solve the root problem.” He talked about machinery leaking oil; you can add oil or change the gasket.

The root cause is the size, scope and intrusiveness of government. “As government grew, our freedoms necessarily receded,” he said.

Low information voters easily fall prey to demagogues.

Long-term strategy in DC? No, “it’s all tactics,” he said. “We also need a strategy for the conservative movement.”

Our vision statement begins “we hold these truths to be self evident,” but the right doesn’t have a strategy to reaffirm the Founders’ vision.

The left’s strategy: “Addict people to government.” It works.

On the DC priority list:  ”I haven’t heard America yet.”

“Here’s the challenge for conservatives … ”  ”Well, they’re giving away candy. We’re the ones, I’m sorry America, candy causes cavities. Oh, it’s worse than that, it’s caused an abcess. Oh, it’s worse than that,” the absess is infected and we’re going to die if we don’t operate.

One advantage: “The truth is on our side.”

How did you we get into a time when corporations are demonized? When you control the colleges of law, education, economics, “you utterly control our culture.”

“The only way we get this country back is information,” Johnson said. “It’s a war of ideas.”

In business, you find out what you agree on. “We have got to tap into the network” of those who understand the free-market system.

“It’s up to us,” he said. Business owners can carry this message.

Then he stuns us with a clear picture of our debt.

His most shocking statistic:  the real federal liabilities are equaled by total assets.

Except: it’s that “good” only because interest rates are so low.

If interest rates went back to historical levels, that adds hundreds of billions to burden.

Then the rate of out of wedlock births, from 4 percent in Sixties, then 8 percent in 1966. Then 41 percent now.

He notes the $16T war on poverty, and $16T rate.

Once again the devastation caused by unintended consequences.

###

People don’t know the Senate hasn’t done a budget in nearly four years, PLUS Obama’s last three budget got zero votes.

###

“The American spirit is alive,” he said, recalling visits to soldiers undergoing rehab.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CLC: John Lott and Why Gun Control Doesn’t Work

John Lott is an economist and author who is best known for his book More Guns: Less Crime. He has just published a book on the administration: At the Brink: Will Obama Push Us over the Edge?

He opens our Saturday session.

He was in Colorado, which faces gun-control legislation. He notes how the White House was strong-arming the legislature.

Lott exposes the canard that 40 percent of gun purchases occur without background checks. “The problem is, it’s simply not true,” Lott said.

It’s based on a survey of all transfers, not just sales. The vast majority were family inheritances and gifts. It’s not so impressive to say that a lot of parents give children guns as presents or inheritances.

Also, many sales are “kitchen table” sales, and buyers may not realized the dealers were in fact licensed.

Another claim: that a million or more people were prevented from buying guns. Not true. That’s denials, not really keeping people from getting guns. It turns out 94 percent were “false denials.”  In 2010 — 13 guilty pleas or verdicts. That is, almost nothing.

And what about even the delay in granting permits? There’s a small number who really are in danger. The net result: More people are harmed than are protected.

The question: “Can you name one place where guns have been banned that has seen its murder rate fall?” Lott: “I can’t find it.”

He’s looked all over the world, and finds the murder rate goes up, “sometimes dramatically.”

Even island nations show increases in murder rates.

And you don’t have to conjure up hypothetical scenarios. Like two pilots shooting each other! But for decades all US commercial pilots had to carry a loaded handgun from 1920s to 1963, and could carry them until 1979. And no problems! And there even stories of pilots using guns to detain criminals.

Or kids in NYC until 1969 schools had rifle teams, and kids carried guns! There were thousands of kids carrying their rifles to school!

The District of Columbia: crime dropped when gun laws were eased.

Mass killers? They are suicidal. They want to kill more people.

Mass killings happen in areas where guns are banned. Take the Aurora killing. There were seven theaters in his area. The killer went to the one theater that posted signs banning concealed handguns. “You see this time after time.”

 

 

 

 

 

CLC: Power and the People

(One theme of the Conservative Leadership Conference is the bottoms-up model of change.

Former Sen. Jim DeMint, president-elect of the Heritage Foundation, hailed grassroots activism, in his speech at lunch. He told the crowd, “What’s making a difference is you — and people like you across the country.”

This is needed because Republicans in Washington “didn’t do what we said we’d do.”

He said that where conservatives have gained, it was due to local activists, not the establishment. “Republicans didn’t take back the House in 2010 — it was America that took it back.”

It is also on the state level that conservatives have made gains. The states can’t print money like Washington can, therefore they have to be more fiscally prudent — thus more conservative.

Plus, the states expose the realities about liberalism vs. conservatism. Look at the plight of California and Illinois compared to Texas and Utah.

Michele Malkin had a funny video making fun of liberalism, and herself. The larger point is that conservatives must use pop culture.

And an insightful speech. She noted that technology allows us to become the definers of our lives and country, thus in another way returning power to the people.

The power of the hashtag, such as #teaparty. She extols the power of a little sign to get information “that had been blocked, erased, by the deciders” at the mainstream media.

Twitter become a kind of samizdat,  breaching the power of the censors.

“Acedemic excellence is so fundamental to fixing our problems,” she said. ”How can we win a debate on the sequestration or the budget if these kids can’t add or subtract or multiply?”

How can you explain that “cuts” are not cuts if they can’t do math? she asks.

 

(We’ll have more on this appearance soon.)