2010 Absentee Vote Turnout (as of 10/28/10)

Early Vote Highlights.

Visit Civitas Vote Tracker for more information on early voting turnout.

Data is downloaded from the State Board of Elections website.

voter_party_code Votes Change from previous
Total 734454 101014
DEM 335989 48848
REP 273215 35274
UNA 124578 16806
LIB 672 86

 

county_desc #voters change from previous
WAKE 58521 none
MECKLENBURG 54495 none
GUILFORD 36090 none
BUNCOMBE 26063 none
FORSYTH 21889 none
NEW HANOVER 18696 up 1
BRUNSWICK 18610 down 1
DURHAM 18149 up 1
CUMBERLAND 17998 down 1
HENDERSON 15282 none
     
     
     
race #voters  
NOT ENTERED 2494  
AMERICAN INDIAN or ALASKA NATIVE 2364  
ASIAN 2162  
BLACK or AFRICAN AMERICAN 142113  
OTHER 5093  
TWO or MORE RACES 1339  
UNDESIGNATED 5317  
WHITE 573572  
     
 

446 more 110 year olds voted yesterday the total for that age group is now at 2660 and is included in the >75 group category
   
     
age #voters  
<26 24390  
26-35 38456  
36-45 74553  
46-55 132158  
56-65 197690  
66-75 165635  
>75 101574  
     
 
     
     

2 Comments on this post

  • Tony Hooker says:
    Oct 22 at 10:23

    I went and looked at the data, and apparently there are a few more impressive ones. There are 3 voters who are 134, 239 and 247 years old.

    I’m assuming that the 111 and 112 entries are all due to dates in 1900. (Probably some on 1/1/1900, some on real day/real month/1900

    Go here: ftp://www.app.sboe.state.nc.us/enrs and download absentee11xx06xx2012.zip

    There may be a newer version each day, so look for the newest version.

    I think this is a big nothingburger, due to data entry errors. I’m the first to jump on cases of vote fraud, but I think this is probably something else.

    (And they should change the data entry system so that an incorrect date gives an error, rather than entering a default 1900 date)

  • NJ-Ray says:
    Nov 14 at 12:27

    Hmmm, I looked at the data too and saw a whole bunch of 112 year olds. Did you ask why would so many people have a birth year of 1900? How about when entering voter data they did not have a DOB so it defaulted to or was entered as 1900. I even chased down a couple of names on spokeo.com and one was listed as in the 60′s, another in their 30′s. Stop being so stupid! Geez!

8 Trackbacks

Post A Comment

Your email is never shared, but is required for commenting. Required fields are marked *

*

*