Tweet
Share
Email
In virtually every news report about the economy, we hear reports on consumer spending – whether it be up or down. Consumer spending constitutes 70 percent of the economy, we are told, and therefore a boost in such spending is needed to spur economic growth. Liberal politicians also spout these lines when advocating for Keynesian spending schemes designed to “boost aggregate demand” and get the economy moving again.
Like most economic news reporting and Keynesian dogma, however, this concept is completely backwards.
As economist Mark Skousen discusses in this excellent article, consumer spending is indeed not the driver of the economy.
The truth is that consumer spending does not account for 70 percent of economic activity and is not the mainstay of the U. S. economy. Investment is! Business spending on capital goods, new technology, entrepreneurship, and productivity are more significant than consumer spending in sustaining the economy and a higher standard of living. In the business cycle, production and investment lead the economy into and out a recession; retail demand is the most stable component of economic activity.
Granted, personal consumption expenditures represent 70 percent of gross domestic product, but journalists should know from Econ 101 that GDP only measures the value of final output. It deliberately leaves out a big chunk of the economy — intermediate production or goods-in-process at the commodity, manufacturing, and wholesale stages — to avoid double counting. I calculated total spending (sales or receipts) in the economy at all stages to be more than double GDP (using gross business receipts compiled annually by the IRS). By this measure — which I have dubbed gross domestic expenditures, or GDE — consumption represents only about 30 percent of the economy, while business investment (including intermediate output) represents over 50 percent.
Thus the truth is just the opposite: Consumer spending is the effect, not the cause, of a productive healthy economy.
Skousen also reveals that it is in fact a higher savings rate that is associated with greater economic growth, because savings is what makes investment spending possible and a higher savings rate translates into lower interest rates. Lower interest rates makes it more affordable for entrepreneurs to invest.
Now contrast this revelation with government policies that discourage savings, such as capital gains taxes and inflationary “stimulus” spending that erodes the value of people’s savings.
Skousen’s article articulates economic lessons sorely needed by journalists, politicians, and big-government advocates alike. Read the whole thing.
One Comment on this post
May 19 at 20:05
Hi! Would you mind if I share your blog with my zynga group?
There’s a lot of people that I think would really appreciate your content. Please let me know. Thanks
7 Trackbacks
Jun 23 at 10:19
[...] isn’t consumer spending the key, because we are told that it makes up 70% of GDP? Last month, I exposed that myth with the research of economist Mark Skouson Granted, personal consumption expenditures represent 70 [...]
Aug 16 at 14:36
[...] But let’s not forget that the government must first remove capital (through borrowing) from the economy in order to finance stimulus spending – leaving less money for entrepreneurs to productively invest in profit-seeking ventures as producers attempt to realign their production to the preferences of consumers. This process is especially damaging in light of the fact that it is investment, not consumer, spending that drives economic growth. [...]
Aug 17 at 12:04
[...] reality, it is Nichols whose rationale is backwards. The foundation for his reasoning is the easily discredited notion that consumer spending is the key to economic growth. To the contrary, ups and downs in [...]
Aug 05 at 12:21
[...] written on this before, but it certainly bears repeating. As economist Mark Skousen described: The truth is that consumer [...]
Sep 14 at 10:58
[...] Higgs updates us on an ongoing theme I have discussed here a number of times in the past: the myth that it is consumer spending that drives economic growth and recession. Dips in consumer spending [...]
Jun 29 at 12:08
[...] local economies where the EITC dollars are spent shows the author’s ignorant adherence to the myth that consumer spending is the cause of economic growth. In an era of stagnating wages and benefits, the EITC is an [...]
Jun 29 at 12:11
[...] as I have noted several times in the past, consumer spending does not drive the economy and is not the cause of recessions. In [...]